69Obsoleet69

[ThefoX]

When we combine our imagination with knowledge in a simple thought process we are delving into our wisdom, which allows us to create and forge things that do not exist in actuality, or things that exist in actuality but we haven’t seen yet; and we have used this wisdom to advance throughout the ages -- to create something we first require the knowledge of the factors and then a wisdom blueprint of the result. An example being a cardboard box – we first need the knowledge of cardboard and structure, and then a wisdom blueprint of both combined. Alongside our scientific related wisdom we also have creative related wisdom, this allows us to imagine and craft things such as paintings and statues rather than technology. Different kinds of knowledge will have different effects on our wisdom, ultimately defining our characters and personality.

In modern times we are forced to learn academically which aids the views of the sovereign that control us. Although we may think and believe that we have freedom of thought and imagination, we most definitely do not. Religions are existent around the world and each have different ways to explain the universe – some of which have been edited and ridiculed by various evil people throughout the times, to better their control and to increase their power. Being forced to make sense of existence is important in this generation; however, us being educated in a certain way without the choice of the other is for advancement purposes only and not for the betterment of humanity. Those at the top of the economy will receive the benefits of academia, whilst those at the bottom will continue to work and stress to keep the economy stable and technology advancing.

Whilst in nonsensical actuality there is a solitary truth that makes sense, that everything no matter what it is has a top, bottom, left, right, front, back, future and past – existing as dualities and neither having more significance than the other. The best way to describe this truth is as a cube. A real cube abides by this truth and is the perfect example. This shows us that this only truth is omnipotent sense/knowledge, and everything inside of this truth is the omnipotent’s nonsense/imagination. We all exist in-between this truth as this truth. Each and every one of us has a front, back, top, bottom, left, right, future and past; and as we move and complete actions we do so in an environment that also abides by this law; this ‘environment’ or ‘universe’ is the only omnipotent sense/knowledge, and the gravity that shapes and distorts everything is the omnipotent’s nonsense/imagination and obvious love for everything.

The omnipotent cannot be avoided, no-one has the choice whether to believe in it or not. We can deny that it exists and lie to ourselves, but ultimately we can’t escape the truth. As humans we can make sense of its imagination through a rational belief that this nonsense can and will make sense if we learn enough about it. By simply recognizing the truth we are being honest and reasonable, by denying it we are being dishonest and unreasonable. It’s our human right that we should be allowed to know the truth rather than being educated unknowingly, although unknowingly everything makes sense it’s not fair on those who want to know what’s real from what’s not.

The Unionistic view on existence is that whilst knowing the truth we are still sensible and consider the primary reality to be required for humanities well-being and survivability, the rational belief to be considered and known so we can advance and live accordingly. Instead of simply disregarding reality once we understand that nothing makes sense as we know of its importance, we should regard it higher and continue to help it achieve its ultimate goal of technological advancement for the betterment of our species.

The Unionistic view on behaviour is that whilst we live we can choose any secondary beliefs we like, if we can make sense out of our existence in other more creative ways then there should be nothing obstructing our path or people telling us that we’re insane or deluded, because it’s not true. We also believe that there should be no limits on incorporating an imaginative ego within the primary reality which we gained from a secondary, as we can build our own characters and personalities.

The Unionistic view on preaching is that we do not force realties on others, but rather free their minds so that they can forge and construct any reality that they want to outside of the primary reality. Although telling people of realities that we have created is fine, but we must always allow them to understand that it was our personal choice and that it is not the ultimate truth.

Our environment is completely based on the primary reality, everything technological or structured makes sense and there is no avoiding it. This is called a word-matrix and we have no choice whether to be a part of it or not. We must learn to exist within it and help others exist within it alongside us. Each and every factor of the matrix is evolution of a word and there are many words. First we must understand and name ‘wood’ and ‘structure’ before we can build a ‘wooden house’ – the semantics (the meaning or the interpretation of a word, sentence, or other language form) and the lexis (the total set of words in a language as distinct from morphology; vocabulary) are progressive and as they progress we evolve as a species technology-wise and understanding-wise; although in some cases the lexis may change but the semantics will remain the same and vice versa, which accounts for the array of different languages.

As we move around in this matrix we are confronted with many words and how we react to each of them relies on the current semantics that are in our minds. If our personal semantics is that a cat or dog is an enemy then when we see one we will react to it as if it was an enemy, but we will also react depending what we know about the word (remember, in actuality a cat or dog is word-less, makes no sense; our reactions are on the word and not the being), the more we learn about the behaviour of a cat or dog the more our personal semantics changes. This applies to everything in reality; if the factor is man-made then it generally makes more sense – for example, a door; we know it can open and close, but we also know that we can break through it amongst other less-generic actions, but there are limits as to what you can do with a door.

THAT IS ALL.